Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see your point. But then this is really not a security issue, but > an "are you sure you want to format C:" style protection for the > user's own sake. Adding a mount option (checked by the library) for > this would be fine. E.g. with "mount_nonempty" it would not refuse to > mount on a non-leaf dir, and README would document, that using this > option might cause trouble. Otherwise the mount would be refused with > a reference to the above option.
IMO that should be a generic mount option, not FUSE specific. Maybe the default could vary for each fs, but I'd vote against that. -- Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
