On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Andreas Mohr <a...@lisas.de> wrote:
>
> Yet that is what any VirtualAlloc() call on Windows does
> One thing less left to wonder why 'doze is such a performance pig...
Well, to be fair, you shouldn't use VirtualAlloc() as some 'malloc()'
replacement. It's more of a backing store allocator for malloc() and
friends than anything else.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
