On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:33:08PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote: > On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:18PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote: > >> Most of the stuff of kprobes-arm64.c can also be used by uprobes.c. So > >> move all those part to common code area. In the process rename kprobe to > >> probe whereever possible. > >> > >> No functional change. > > > > In which case, can you merge this into the kprobes series (which we haven't > > merged yet)? > > > > Yes, thats why these are just RFCs. I will send next version of uprobe > only after kprobe patches are accepted into maintainer's tree.
Ok, but it also makes sense to make kprobes refactoring changes *before* the patches are merged, as that reduces churn in mainline whilst you don't have any other dependencies. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
