On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:20PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> instruction_pointer_set is needed for uprobe implementation. Hence
> define it for ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <pan...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 24cc048ac3e7..29d9bf5e3635 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs
> *regs)
> #define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->pc)
> #define stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->sp)
>
> +static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
> + unsigned long val)
> +{
> + instruction_pointer(regs) = val;
> +}
Do you think we could make use of the asm-generic ptrace header to get
this for free? afaict, we just need to implement GET_USP and possibly
GET_FP for the compat case (although it may well be that we still handle
the compat case entirely separately).
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
