On 01/08/2015 09:21 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 
> Okay. How about adding one more like below?
> 
> #define COMPACT_NO_SUITABLE_PAGE
> #define COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE_ZONE

Yeah that would be less confusing.

> It will distiguish return value properly.
> 
>> >    return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > +unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
>> > +                                  int alloc_flags, int classzone_idx)
>> > +{
>> > +  unsigned long ret;
>> > +
>> > +  ret = __compaction_suitable(zone, order, alloc_flags, classzone_idx);
>> > +  trace_mm_compaction_suitable(zone, order, alloc_flags,
>> > +                                          classzone_idx, ret);
>> > +  if (ret == COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE)
>> > +          ret = COMPACT_SKIPPED;
>> 
>> I don't like this wrapping just for tracepints, but I don't know of a better 
>> way :/
> 
> Yes, I don't like it, too. :/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to