On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:37 +0000, Erik Grinaker wrote: > I agree. I have contacted Amazon about this, but am not too hopeful > for a quick fix; they have been promising SACK-support on their > loadbalancers since 2006, for example. > > That said, since this change breaks a service as popular as S3, it > might be worth reconsidering. >
Which change are you talking about ? Have you done a bisection to clearly identify the patch exposing this sender bug ? We are not going to stick TCP stack to 20th century and buggy peers or middleboxes, sorry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
