Hello, Michal. Sorry about the long delay.
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
...
> @@ -252,6 +220,8 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
> + oom_killer_enable();
> +
Wouldn't it be more symmetrical and make more sense to enable oom
killer after kernel threads are thawed? Until kernel threads are
thawed, it isn't guaranteed that oom killer would be able to make
forward progress, right?
Other than that, looks good to me.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
