From: Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index a10f7cd2619e..ca2387ef27ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ In summary:
However, they do -not- guarantee any other sort of ordering:
Not prior loads against later loads, nor prior stores against
later anything. If you need these other forms of ordering,
- use smb_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
+ use smp_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
later loads, smp_mb().
(*) If both legs of the "if" statement begin with identical stores
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
