On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:51:56PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  9 +++++++++
>  kernel/events/core.c                | 37 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 4c81a86..8ead8d8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt

> @@ -2763,6 +2764,14 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be 
> entirely omitted.
>                       allocator.  This parameter is primarily for debugging
>                       and performance comparison.
>  
> +     perf_use_local_clock
> +                     [PERF]
> +                     Use local_clock() as a source for perf timestamps
> +                     generation. This was be the default behaviour and
> +                     this parameter can be used to maintain backward
> +                     compatibility or on older hardware with expensive
> +                     monotonic clock source.
> +
>       pf.             [PARIDE]
>                       See Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt.

So I'm always terminally confused on the naming of kernel parameters,
sometimes things are modules (even when they're not actually =m capable)
and get a module::foo naming or so and sometimes they're not.

So we want to use the module naming thing or not?

> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 2b02c9f..5d0aa03 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c

> @@ -322,8 +323,41 @@ extern __weak const char *perf_pmu_name(void)
>       return "pmu";
>  }
>  
> +static bool perf_use_local_clock;
> +static int __init perf_use_local_clock_setup(char *__unused)
> +{
> +     perf_use_local_clock = true;
> +     return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("perf_use_local_clock", perf_use_local_clock_setup);

>  static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
>  {
> +     if (likely(!perf_use_local_clock))
> +             return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
> +
>       return local_clock();
>  }

Since this all is boot time, should we not use things like static_key
and avoid the 'pointless' conditional at runtime?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to