On Friday 02 January 2015 17:02:21 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> 2015-01-02 10:46 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>:
> > On Thursday 01 January 2015 18:06:34 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> >
> > You have correctly spotted the only place that references
> > voltdm_for_each_pwrdm
> > and changed the comment, but you failed to notice that it no longer makes
> > sense to call voltdm_add_pwrdm or keep the voltdm->pwrdm_list pointer
> > at all, so this function, and the associated list heads can all be removed
> > as well.
> >
> > Arnd
> >
>
>
> Hi Arnd
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I see what you mean, but you are aware that voltdm_add_pwrdm() also be
> called from:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c in _pwrdm_register()
Yes, that call needs to be removed as well of course.
> I have also removde the voltdm_for_each()
Ok, sounds good. That list of course has to stay though, so removing
_voltdm_register would be bad ;-)
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
