On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 04:34:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014年12月31日 04:13, ashw...@codeaurora.org wrote: > >Hi Hanjun, > > > >Overall the document looks good to us. Some minor clarifications below. > > > >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.greg...@linaro.org> > >> > >>Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI > >>on ARM64. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.greg...@linaro.org> > >>Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.st...@linaro.org> > >>Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org> > >>--- > >> Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt | 323 > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 323 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt > >> > > > >[..] > > > >>+Relationship with Device Tree > >>+----------------------------- > > > >[..] > > > >>+When booting using ACPI tables, the /chosen node in DT will still be > >>parsed > >>+to extract the kernel command line and initrd path. No other section of > >>the > >>+DT will be used. > > > >Is this still true? > > No, we can booting the ACPI system in EFI stub without dtb. Catalin > also pointed out this issue, I will remove this paragraph. >
The paragraph is still correct, the /chosen node is always present even if nothing else is. Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
