On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Chris Friesen wrote:
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
No. Accompany it with a written offer to __provide__ the source code for any GPL stuff they used (like the kernel or drivers). Anything at the application-level is NOT covered by the GPL. They do not have to give away their trade-secrets.
GPL'd applications would still be covered by the GPL, no?
You mean like `ls` and `init` ??? Sure. I don't think any serious embedded stuff would use that, though. Typically an embedded system would start with a new application called 'init'. It wouldn't use a SYS-V startup and certainly wouldn't have a shell. The new init would do everything including mounting any file- systems and initializing networking all by itself without any help from the usual applications. It might fork-off a few different tasks to handle different things. For instance, the system shown probably handles the furnace and air-conditioner as a separate task. The shades and blinds are probably another and, certainly, communicating with the robot that mows the lawn would require a separate task just to handle GPS.
If I buy their product, I should be able to ask them for the source to all GPL'd entities that are present in the system, including the kernel, drivers, and all GPL'd userspace apps.
Any *new* apps that they wrote they would of course be free to keep private.
Yep.
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.11 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips). Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by Dictator Bush. 98.36% of all statistics are fiction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
