On 12/16/2014 10:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17 December 2014 at 04:39, Dmitry Torokhov <d...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> cpufreq-dt driver supports mode when OPP table is provided by platform
>> code and not device tree. However on certain platforms code that fills
>> OPP table may run after cpufreq driver tries to initialize, so let's
>> report -EPROBE_DEFER if we do not find any entires in OPP table for the
>> CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <d...@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
>> index f56147a..fde97d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
>> @@ -211,6 +211,17 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> /* OPPs might be populated at runtime, don't check for error here */
>> of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * But we need OPP table to function so if it is not there let's
>> + * give platform code chance to provide it for us.
>> + */
>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
>> + if (ret <= 0) {
>> + pr_debug("OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n");
>> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + goto out_free_opp;
Umm.. why would I be here? because of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev) did not
find any OPPs at all. but that is OK, coz, we expect dynamic addition
of OPPs by someone else... now,
case 1:
if I did have few OPPs in DT (of_init_opp_table) and cpufreq_init gets
called *before* my dynamic OPPs are added(example based on efuse
entries) -> I'd already have built my dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table
and that wont be accurate. but at that point dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count
cant fail either.. and if cpufreq_init was called *after* dynamic OPPs
are added - correct table, AND dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count wont fail either.
case 2:
If I had 0 OPPs in DT (of_init_opp_table fails) and cpufreq_init gets
called *before* my dynamic OPPs are added(example based on efuse
entries) -> doing a goto out_free_opp and of_free_opp_table is of no
use at all..
case 3:
If I had 0 OPPs in DT (of_init_opp_table fails) and cpufreq_init gets
called *after* my dynamic OPPs are added(example based on efuse
entries) -> I wont have error dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count.
So, you'd better want to introduce an intermediate goto for of_node_put
Also, please use dev_dbg instead of pr_*, since you already have
cpu_dev pointer.
>> + }
>> +
>> priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!priv) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
