On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > This is my personal opinion and Jiri can say something different. I > tend not to send big patches while there is a window opened. Sometimes > Jiri has the time to get through them, sometime he does not. > In this case, I think the patches you sent should be in the bugs fixes > categories, and, IMO should make into 3.19-rc1 or 3.19-rc2 (especially > the length check which could lead to CVEs if not tackled soon enough). > For these kind of things there is no timing, and the sooner the > better. > That being said, make sure that you keep track of those patches in > case they get lost for obvious reasons and be prepared to remind about > them if they do not make their way in Jiri's tree. > > Jiri, comments?
I don't mind patches being sent during a merge window, it doesn't disturb my workflow. But it's always good to explicitly mark patches which are bugfixes and should go to -rc, so that I bump up the priority for reviewing them. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
