On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:56:38AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, that was a bit snotty on my part, I apologize.
> 
> But really, this is self-contained, doesn't touch any core
> infrastructure, and is really just like any other driver for hardware
> that people don't use.  It shouldn't affect anything elsewhere in the
> kernel, so objecting to it seems odd to me.

I does dig into internals in quite nasty ways.  I driver that is always
modular and just uses existing exported APIs in proper ways and adds no
to little new userspaces ABIs is one things.  A new IPCs mechanisms that
pokes into internals and exposes a huge ABI/API is a totally different
thing.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to