(2014/12/16 17:10), Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
(2014/12/16 16:49), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On 12/15/2014 07:18 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
Workqueue keeps cpu<->node relationship including all possible cpus.
The original information was made at boot but it may change when
a new node is added.

Update information if a new node is ready with using node-hotplug callback.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |  2 ++
  kernel/workqueue.c             | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  4 ++++
  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
index 8f1a419..cd3cb67 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -270,4 +270,6 @@ extern void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, 
struct mem_section *ms)
  extern struct page *sparse_decode_mem_map(unsigned long coded_mem_map,
                        unsigned long pnum);

+/* update for workqueues */
+void workqueue_node_register(int node);
  #endif /* __LINUX_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_H */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 2fd0bd7..5499b76 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
  static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;

  static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
-                    /* possible CPUs of each node */
+                    /* PL: possible CPUs of each node */

  static bool wq_disable_numa;
  module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
@@ -4559,6 +4559,32 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct 
worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
          WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
                            pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
  }
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+
+static void reflesh_wq_possible_mask(int cpu, int node)
+{
+    int oldnode;
+    for_each_node_state(oldnode, N_POSSIBLE)
+        cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[oldnode]);

You need to check and update all the wq->numa_pwq_tbl[oldnode]


you mean : if I drop patch 1/4, it will be required. Right ?
I'll add that check.

Ah, isn't it handled by wq_update_unbound_numa() called at 
workqueue_cpu_down_callback() ?
Because node's online cpumask will be empty, new pwq will be attached.

Thanks
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to