On 16 December 2014 at 02:54, Pan, Jacob jun <jacob.jun....@intel.com> wrote:

> Looks good to me. You can add my Reviewed-by to the above patch.

Thanks.

> I have tested this fix and confirm powerclamp is working properly now.

Oh, nice.

> However, we also have a planned patch for consolidated idle loop. With this 
> patch it causes some erratic behavior in idle injection.
> I can’t seem to synchronize/align idle time around jiffies with this patch + 
> fix.
>
> Any suggestions welcome.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/56

And all works fine without this patch ?
2a16fc93d2c9 ("nohz: Avoid tick's double reprogramming in highres mode")

I really don't know what stuff out of the two patches I posted (The above one
and the fix I posted yesterday), will possible make the synchronization bad ..

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to