The rw argument to direct_IO has some ill-defined semantics. Some
filesystems (e.g., ext4, FAT) decide whether they're doing a write with
rw == WRITE, but others (e.g., XFS) check rw & WRITE. Let's set a good
example in the swap file code and say ITER_BVEC belongs in
iov_iter->flags but not in rw. This caters to the least common
denominator and avoids a sweeping change of every direct_IO
implementation for now.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@osandov.com>
---
 mm/page_io.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
index 1630ac0..c229f88 100644
--- a/mm/page_io.c
+++ b/mm/page_io.c
@@ -285,8 +285,7 @@ int __swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct 
writeback_control *wbc,
                set_page_writeback(page);
                unlock_page(page);
                mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-               ret = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(ITER_BVEC | WRITE,
-                                               &kiocb, &from,
+               ret = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(WRITE, &kiocb, &from,
                                                kiocb.ki_pos);
                mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
                if (ret == PAGE_SIZE) {
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to