(2014/12/15 11:48), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On 12/15/2014 10:20 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
(2014/12/15 11:12), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On 12/14/2014 12:38 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
Although workqueue detects relationship between cpu<->node at boot,
it is finally determined in cpu_up().
This patch tries to update pool->node using online status of cpus.

1. When a node goes down, clear per-cpu pool's node attr.
2. When a cpu comes up, update per-cpu pool's node attr.
3. When a cpu comes up, update possinle node cpumask workqueue is using for 
sched.
4. Detect the best node for unbound pool's cpumask using the latest info.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
   kernel/workqueue.c | 67 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 07b4eb5..259b3ba 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
   static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;

   static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
-                    /* possible CPUs of each node */
+    /* possible CPUs of each node initialized with possible info at boot.
+           but modified at cpu hotplug to be adjusted to real info.  */

   static bool wq_disable_numa;
   module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
@@ -3449,6 +3450,31 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
       call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
   }

+/*
+ * detect best node for given cpumask.
+ */
+static int pool_detect_best_node(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
+{
+    int node, best, match, selected;
+    static struct cpumask andmask; /* we're under mutex */
+
+    /* Is any node okay ? */
+    if (!wq_numa_enabled ||
+        cpumask_subset(cpu_online_mask, cpumask))
+        return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+    best = 0;
+    selected = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+    /* select a node which contains the most cpu of cpumask */
+    for_each_node_state(node, N_ONLINE) {
+        cpumask_and(&andmask, cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node));
+        match = cpumask_weight(&andmask);
+        if (match > best)
+            selected = node;
+    }
+    return selected;
+}
+
+
   /**
    * get_unbound_pool - get a worker_pool with the specified attributes
    * @attrs: the attributes of the worker_pool to get
@@ -3467,7 +3493,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct 
workqueue_attrs *attrs)
   {
       u32 hash = wqattrs_hash(attrs);
       struct worker_pool *pool;
-    int node;

       lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

@@ -3492,17 +3517,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct 
workqueue_attrs *attrs)
        * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
        */
       pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
-
-    /* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
-    if (wq_numa_enabled) {
-        for_each_node(node) {
-            if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
-                       wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
-                pool->node = node;
-                break;
-            }
-        }
-    }
+    pool->node = pool_detect_best_node(pool->attrs->cpumask);

       if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0)
           goto fail;
@@ -4567,7 +4582,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct 
notifier_block *nfb,
       int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
       struct worker_pool *pool;
       struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-    int pi;
+    int pi, node;

       switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
       case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
@@ -4583,6 +4598,16 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct 
notifier_block *nfb,
       case CPU_ONLINE:
           mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);

+        /* now cpu <-> node info is established, update the info. */
+        if (!wq_disable_numa) {



+            for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
+                cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu,
+                    wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);

The wq code try to reuse the origin pwqs/pools when the node still have cpu 
online.
these 3 lines of code will cause the origin pwqs/pools be on the road of dying, 
and
create a new set of pwqs/pools.

because the result of wq_calc_node_cpumask() changes ?

Yes.

Do you mean some comment should be added here ? or explaination for your reply 
for [3/4] ?

this fix [4/4] breaks the original design.


I'm sorry that I can't understand what this patch breaks.
Do you mean it's better to work with broken wq_numa_possible_cpumask ?

I guess removing wq_numa_possible_mask entirely may be the best way
byusing online_mask of the node.

Thanks,
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to