On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:51:22AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:45:48PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > +static void __clear_swapfile_extents(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +   u64 isize = inode->i_size;
> > +   struct extent_map *em;
> > +   u64 start, len;
> > +
> > +   start = 0;
> > +   while (start < isize) {
> > +           len = isize - start;
> > +           em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, start, len, 0);
> > +           if (IS_ERR(em))
> > +                   return;
> 
> This could transiently fail if there's no memory to allocate the em, and
> would leak the following extents.
> 
This leak I was aware of, and at the time I didn't see a good way to get
around it. After all, if we can't get the current extent, there's no way
to iterate through the rest of them. Now I see that instead of doing
this at the btrfs_get_extent level, I can just go through all of the
extent_maps in the extent_map_tree.

> > +
> > +           clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_SWAPFILE, &em->flags);
> > +
> > +           start = extent_map_end(em);
> > +           free_extent_map(em);
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int btrfs_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, struct file 
> > *file,
> > +                          sector_t *span)
> > +{
> > +   struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > +   struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info;
> > +   struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
> > +   int ret = 0;
> > +   u64 isize = inode->i_size;
> > +   struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
> > +   struct extent_map *em;
> > +   u64 start, len;
> > +
> > +   if (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_COMPRESS) {
> > +           /* Can't do direct I/O on a compressed file. */
> > +           btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is compressed");
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
> > +   if (!(BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW)) {
> > +           /*
> > +            * Going through the copy-on-write path while swapping pages
> > +            * in/out and doing a bunch of allocations could stress the
> > +            * memory management code that got us there in the first place,
> > +            * and that's sure to be a bad time.
> > +            */
> > +           btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is copy-on-write");
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   lock_extent_bits(io_tree, 0, isize - 1, 0, &cached_state);
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * All of the extents must be allocated and support direct I/O. Inline
> > +    * extents and compressed extents fall back to buffered I/O, so those
> > +    * are no good. Additionally, all of the extents must be safe for nocow.
> > +    */
> > +   atomic_inc(&BTRFS_I(inode)->root->nr_swapfiles);
> > +   start = 0;
> > +   while (start < isize) {
> > +           len = isize - start;
> > +           em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, start, len, 0);
> > +           if (IS_ERR(em)) {
> 
>               IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em)
> 
> From now on the em is valid and has to be free_extent_map()ed ...
> 
> > +                   ret = PTR_ERR(em);
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_VACANCY, &em->flags) ||
> > +               em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE) {
> > +                   btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile has holes");
> > +                   ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> ... and all the error branches would miss it.
> 
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +           if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE) {
> > +                   /*
> > +                    * It's unlikely we'll ever actually find ourselves
> > +                    * here, as a file small enough to fit inline won't be
> > +                    * big enough to store more than the swap header, but in
> > +                    * case something changes in the future, let's catch it
> > +                    * here rather than later.
> > +                    */
> > +                   btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is inline");
> > +                   ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> here
> 
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +           if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_COMPRESSED, &em->flags)) {
> > +                   btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is compresed");
> > +                   ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> here
> 
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +           ret = can_nocow_extent(inode, start, &len, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +           if (ret < 0) {
> 
> here
> 
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           } else if (ret == 1) {
> > +                   ret = 0;
> > +           } else {
> > +                   btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile has extent requiring COW 
> > (%llu-%llu)",
> > +                             start, start + len - 1);
> > +                   ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> here
> 
> > +                   goto out;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           set_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_SWAPFILE, &em->flags);
> > +
> > +           start = extent_map_end(em);
> > +           free_extent_map(em);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +out:
> > +   if (ret) {
> 
> should be fixed by:
> 
>               if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em))
>                       free_extent_map(em);
> 
> > +           __clear_swapfile_extents(inode);
> > +           atomic_dec(&BTRFS_I(inode)->root->nr_swapfiles);
> > +   }
> > +   unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, 0, isize - 1, &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
This leak I completely missed. Thanks.

-- 
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to