David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:58:50 +0200 > >> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:02:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> David, assuming patches are acceptable, I'd like them all to be merged >>> through >>> virtio or vhost trees to avoid dependency headaches. Could you please ack >>> doing that for net related patches, especially these: >>> tun: move internal flag defines out of uapi >>> tun: drop most type defines >>> tun: add VNET_LE flag >>> tun: TUN_VNET_LE support, fix sparse warnings for virtio headers >>> macvtap: TUN_VNET_HDR support >>> vhost/scsi: partial virtio 1.0 support >>> af_packet: virtio 1.0 stubs >>> Alternatively, I can prepare a tree with virtio changes and merge >>> that into your net-next - if Rusty approves, or keeps >>> silence :) >> >> David, Rusty - ping. >> Are both of you ok withmerging this through the vhost tree? > > No objections on my side.
Ack here, too. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
