3.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
commit af726f21ed8af2cdaa4e93098dc211521218ae65 upstream.
There's nothing special enough about the espfix64 double fault fixup to
justify writing it in assembly. Move it to C.
This also fixes a bug: if the double fault came from an IST stack, the
old asm code would return to a partially uninitialized stack frame.
Fixes: 3891a04aafd668686239349ea58f3314ea2af86b
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 34 ++--------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ ENTRY(native_iret)
jnz native_irq_return_ldt
#endif
+.global native_irq_return_iret
native_irq_return_iret:
iretq
_ASM_EXTABLE(native_irq_return_iret, bad_iret)
@@ -935,37 +936,6 @@ ENTRY(retint_kernel)
CFI_ENDPROC
END(common_interrupt)
- /*
- * If IRET takes a fault on the espfix stack, then we
- * end up promoting it to a doublefault. In that case,
- * modify the stack to make it look like we just entered
- * the #GP handler from user space, similar to bad_iret.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
- ALIGN
-__do_double_fault:
- XCPT_FRAME 1 RDI+8
- movq RSP(%rdi),%rax /* Trap on the espfix stack? */
- sarq $PGDIR_SHIFT,%rax
- cmpl $ESPFIX_PGD_ENTRY,%eax
- jne do_double_fault /* No, just deliver the fault */
- cmpl $__KERNEL_CS,CS(%rdi)
- jne do_double_fault
- movq RIP(%rdi),%rax
- cmpq $native_irq_return_iret,%rax
- jne do_double_fault /* This shouldn't happen... */
- movq PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack),%rax
- subq $(6*8-KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET),%rax /* Reset to original stack */
- movq %rax,RSP(%rdi)
- movq $0,(%rax) /* Missing (lost) #GP error code */
- movq $general_protection,RIP(%rdi)
- retq
- CFI_ENDPROC
-END(__do_double_fault)
-#else
-# define __do_double_fault do_double_fault
-#endif
-
/*
* APIC interrupts.
*/
@@ -1137,7 +1107,7 @@ idtentry overflow do_overflow has_error_
idtentry bounds do_bounds has_error_code=0
idtentry invalid_op do_invalid_op has_error_code=0
idtentry device_not_available do_device_not_available has_error_code=0
-idtentry double_fault __do_double_fault has_error_code=1 paranoid=1
+idtentry double_fault do_double_fault has_error_code=1 paranoid=1
idtentry coprocessor_segment_overrun do_coprocessor_segment_overrun
has_error_code=0
idtentry invalid_TSS do_invalid_TSS has_error_code=1
idtentry segment_not_present do_segment_not_present has_error_code=1
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -259,6 +259,30 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struc
static const char str[] = "double fault";
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
+ extern unsigned char native_irq_return_iret[];
+
+ /*
+ * If IRET takes a non-IST fault on the espfix64 stack, then we
+ * end up promoting it to a doublefault. In that case, modify
+ * the stack to make it look like we just entered the #GP
+ * handler from user space, similar to bad_iret.
+ */
+ if (((long)regs->sp >> PGDIR_SHIFT) == ESPFIX_PGD_ENTRY &&
+ regs->cs == __KERNEL_CS &&
+ regs->ip == (unsigned long)native_irq_return_iret)
+ {
+ struct pt_regs *normal_regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+
+ /* Fake a #GP(0) from userspace. */
+ memmove(&normal_regs->ip, (void *)regs->sp, 5*8);
+ normal_regs->orig_ax = 0; /* Missing (lost) #GP error code */
+ regs->ip = (unsigned long)general_protection;
+ regs->sp = (unsigned long)&normal_regs->orig_ax;
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+
exception_enter();
/* Return not checked because double check cannot be ignored */
notify_die(DIE_TRAP, str, regs, error_code, X86_TRAP_DF, SIGSEGV);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
