On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, David Daney wrote: > The problem is not with "modern" executables that are properly annotated with > PT_GNU_STACK. > > My objection is to the intentional breaking of old executables that have no > PT_GNU_STACK annotation, but require an executable stack. Since we usually > try not to break userspace, we cannot merge a patch like this one.
How old are these and how many are still around? Can the annotation be added with a tool? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
