On Thursday 04 December 2014 04:23:44 vishnupatekar wrote:
> +
> +#define DRIVER_NAME "sunxi-ps2"
> +
> +#define RESSIZE(res) (((res)->end - (res)->start)+1)
Remove this and use the existing resource_size() function
> +
> +struct sunxips2data {
> + int irq;
> + spinlock_t ps2_lock;
> + void __iomem *base_address; /* virt address of control registers*/
> + struct serio *serio; /* serio*/
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct clk *pclk;
> +};
As this is dynamically allocated, better embed the serio member
directly to avoid allocating both separately.
> +static int sunxips2_open(struct serio *pserio)
> +{
> + struct sunxips2data *drvdata = pserio->port_data;
> + u32 src_clk = 0;
> + u32 clk_scdf;
> + u32 clk_pcdf;
> + u32 rval;
> +
> + /*Set Line Control And Enable Interrupt*/
> + rval =
> SWPS2_LCTL_TXDTOEN|SWPS2_LCTL_STOPERREN|SWPS2_LCTL_ACKERREN|SWPS2_LCTL_PARERREN|SWPS2_LCTL_RXDTOEN;
> + writel(rval, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_LCTRL);
> +
> + /*Reset FIFO*/
> + writel(0x3<<16 | 0x607, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_FCTRL);
> +
> + src_clk = clk_get_rate(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> + if (!src_clk) {
> + dev_info(drvdata->dev, "w_ps2c_set_sclk error, source clock is
> 0.");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /*Set Clock Divider Register*/
> + clk_scdf = ((src_clk + (SW_PS2_SAMPLE_CLK>>1)) / SW_PS2_SAMPLE_CLK - 1);
> + clk_pcdf = ((SW_PS2_SAMPLE_CLK + (SW_PS2_SCLK>>1)) / SW_PS2_SCLK - 1);
> + rval = (clk_scdf<<8) | clk_pcdf;/* | (PS2_DEBUG_SEL<<16);*/
> + writel(rval, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_CLKDR);
> +
> + /*Set Global Control Register*/
> + rval = SWPS2_RESET|SWPS2_INTEN|SWPS2_MASTER|SWPS2_BUSEN;
> + writel(rval, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_GCTRL);
> +
> + udelay(100);
100 microseconds is a rather long time to block the CPU for, so this
needs a comment explaining why the particular delay is needed and why
you can't use usleep_range() instead.
> +static void sunxips2_close(struct serio *pserio)
> +{
> + struct sunxips2data *drvdata = pserio->port_data;
> +
> + spin_lock(&drvdata->ps2_lock);
> + /* Disable the PS2 interrupts */
> + writel(0, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_GCTRL);
> + spin_unlock(&drvdata->ps2_lock);
> +}
The locking is wrong here: you take the lock without disabling the
interrupts first, so if the interrupt happens between the spin_lock()
call and the writel(), the kernel will deadlock.
You will either have to use spin_lock_irq() here, or find a justification
for dropping the lock entirely.
> +static int sunxips2_write(struct serio *pserio, unsigned char val)
> +{
> + struct sunxips2data *drvdata = (struct sunxips2data *)pserio->port_data;
> + u32 timeout = 10000;
> +
> + do {
> + if (readl(drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_FSTAT) &
> SWPS2_FSTA_TXRDY) {
> + writel(val, drvdata->base_address + SW_PS2_DATA);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + } while (timeout--);
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
We never return '-1' from in-kernel functions. Either make this a bool
argument, or return a proper errno.h value. This should probably return
-EIO.
> + drvdata->irq = irq;
> + drvdata->serio = serio;
> + drvdata->dev = dev;
> + error = devm_request_any_context_irq(drvdata->dev, drvdata->irq,
> &sunxips2_interrupt, 0,
> + DRIVER_NAME, drvdata);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev,
> + "Couldn't allocate interrupt %d : error: %d\n",
> drvdata->irq, error);
> + return error;
> + }
> + return 0; /* success */
> +}
Why any_context?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
