On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:23:23PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/12/05 14:08), Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:41:23PM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Add --verbose/-v option for showing echo output in testcases. > >> This is good for checking the progress of testcases which > >> take a longer time to run. > >> > >> To implement this feature, all the testcase failures are > >> captured in ftracetest and send signal to set SIG_RESULT=FAIL. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> > >> --- > > > > [SNIP] > >> - # setup PID and PPID, $$ is not updated. > >> - (cd $TRACING_DIR; read PID _ < /proc/self/stat ; > >> - set -e; set -x; . $1) >> $testlog 2>&1 > >> - eval_result $? $SIG_RESULT > >> + if [ $VERBOSE -ne 0 ]; then > >> + __run_test $1 2>> $testlog | tee -a $testlog > > > > Shouldn't it be > > > > __run_test $1 2>&1 | tee -a $testlog > > > > ? > > No, that outputs both stdout and stderr to $testlog and console. > What I'd like to do above is only stdout to $testlog and console and > stderr goes only to $testlog. (Note that __run_test set -x which outputs > every executed command to stderr)
Hmm.. so the actual output of the failing command is not shown on console even when -v option is given, right? Anyway I worried about that the order of messages might be mixed.. echo msg1 > /dev/stdout echo msg2 > /dev/stderr echo msg3 > /dev/stdout echo msg4 > /dev/stderr So the output in this case can be like msg2, msg4, msg1, and msg3..? Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/