On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:40:38PM +0200, Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there are checks, they should be there for a purpose,
emphasis here is on _should_ > and any sane reader will asume these checks to be nescensary. That's a bad assumptions when you're deadling with drivers or software of similar quality. > If they are dead code, you > can say that, but please don't flame Adrian for fixing obviously buggy code > in a way that is sane and at least more correct than the original without > using several days of his lifetime to analyze the whole driver. Instead, you > could provide the correct fix. The correct fix is to remove the check. And no, we don't have a rule that someone must provide something better when trying to critize it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
