On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Benoit Parrot <bpar...@ti.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote on Fri [2014-Nov-28 16:31:19
> +0900]:
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Benoit Parrot <bpar...@ti.com> wrote:
>> > Add GPIO hogging documentation to gpio.txt
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bpar...@ti.com>
>> > ---
>> > Changes since v1:
>> > * Split the devicetree bindings documentation in its own patch.
>> >
>> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 25
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
>> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
>> > index 3fb8f53..82755e2 100644
>> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
>> > @@ -103,6 +103,24 @@ Every GPIO controller node must contain both an empty
>> > "gpio-controller"
>> > property, and a #gpio-cells integer property, which indicates the number
>> > of
>> > cells in a gpio-specifier.
>> >
>> > +The GPIO chip may contain GPIO hog definitions. GPIO hogging is a
>> > mechanism
>> > +providing automatic GPIO request and configuration as part of the
>> > +gpio-controller's driver probe function.
>> > +
>> > +Each GPIO hog definition is represented as a child node of the GPIO
>> > controller.
>> > +Required properties:
>> > +- gpio-hog: a property specifying that this child node represent a
>> > gpio-hog.
>> > +- gpios: store the gpio information (id, flags, ...). Shall contain the
>> > + number of cells specified in its parent node (GPIO controller node).
>> > +- input: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction as input.
>> > +- output-high: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction to output
>> > with
>> > + the value high.
>> > +- output-low: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction to output
>> > with
>> > + the value low.
>> > +
>> > +Optional properties:
>> > +- line-name: the GPIO label name. If not present the node name is used.
>> > +
>> > Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
>> >
>> > qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@1400 {
>> > @@ -110,6 +128,13 @@ Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as
>> > gpio-controller nodes:
>> > reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
>> > gpio-controller;
>> > #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> > +
>> > + line_b: line_b {
>>
>> Mmm what is the label used for? Can this node ever be referenced from
>> somewhere else?
>
> It's not used for anything else as far as I know other than as the line-name
> to be assigned to the gpio being hogged.
> I guess you agree with Linus and should make the line-name mandatory and
> remove the label altogether?
>
> I was trying to keep the verbosity to a minimum so as to have the possibilty
> to keep everything on a single line when possible.
It's just that when you see a label, you expect it to be referenced
somewhere, which is obviously not the case here. Just having
line_b {
would work just as well, wouldn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
