On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:52:11 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> yeah. teaching tree walk to do (state & 2048) == 0 is not trivial, > since it doesn't have a concept of value of expression. > Doing !(state & 2048) is probably a bit easier, since there > are hacks for 'not' already. That's exactly what I was looking at doing. If I can get something working without spending more than an hour or two, I may even push it for this release cycle. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
