On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote: > On 21 November 2014 at 09:59, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote: >> On 20 November 2014 16:19, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >>> I don't know if we need to have the check at all for IPIP though - >>> after all the driver doesn't expose support for it all (actually it >>> doesn't expose GRE either). This raises kind of an interesting >>> question about the checks though - it's pretty easy to add support to >>> the driver for a new GSO type (and I imagine that people will be >>> adding GRE soon) and forget to update the check. >> >> If the check is more conservative, then testing would show that it's >> not working and lead people to figure out why (and update the check). > > More concretely, one suggestion would be something like following at > the start of each gso_check(): > > + const int supported = SKB_GSO_TCPV4 | SKB_GSO_TCPV6 | SKB_GSO_FCOE | > + SKB_GSO_UDP | SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL; > + > + if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & ~supported) > + return false;
This should already be handled by net_gso_ok. > > ..followed by checking the specifics for each. So far the patches have > only been concerned with further checking on UDP tunnels. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
