After discussing this locally, I'd like to NAK it because this could cause regressions to parts that are still in use but we don't have access to. Also, the assignment was necessary in the past for some versions of gcc and since this may be used in embedded systems using older compilers, we should leave it be.
Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -----Original Message----- From: linux-nics-boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com [mailto:linux-nics-boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com] On Behalf Of Sudip Mukherjee Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:55 PM To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Linux NICS; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; Hisashi T Fujinaka; Vick, Matthew; g...@isotope.jf.intel.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; net...@vger.kernel.org; Wyborny, Carolyn; j...@isotope.jf.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > > I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most > > of this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday > > weekend here in the US. > [...] > > If there were double register reads being replaced with single > register reads, I'd agree this was likely to introduce a regression. > But all I see is var = er32(REG) being changed to er32(REG). no, double register reads are not modified. only the unused variables are removed. thanks sudip > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > The world is coming to an end. Please log off. _______________________________________________ Linux-nics mailing list linux-n...@intel.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
