On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:40:46 +0100
Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > @@ -5094,8 +5094,9 @@ static int b43_op_beacon_set_tim(struct ieee80211_hw 
> > *hw,
> >  {
> >         struct b43_wl *wl = hw_to_b43_wl(hw);
> >
> > -       /* FIXME: add locking */
> > +       mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
> >         b43_update_templates(wl);
> > +       mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
> >
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Does anyone remember why this simple solution wasn't implemented
> earlier? Michael?

I think the callback used to be (is?) in atomic context.

> Nicholas: did you test it anyhow?

-- 
Michael

Attachment: pgprDO2WX2PpQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to