On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:07:36 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Add low level APIs to test/set/clear feature bits.
> For use by transports, to make it easier to
> write code independent of feature bit array format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/virtio_config.h | 53 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 7f4ef66..249fcd6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -77,11 +77,47 @@ void virtio_check_driver_offered_feature(const struct 
> virtio_device *vdev,
>                                        unsigned int fbit);
> 
>  /**
> - * virtio_has_feature - helper to determine if this device has this feature.
> + * __virtio_test_bit - helper to test feature bits. For use by transports.
> + *                     Devices should normally use virtio_has_feature,
> + *                     which includes more checks.
>   * @vdev: the device
>   * @fbit: the feature bit
>   */
> -static inline bool virtio_has_feature(const struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +static inline bool __virtio_test_bit(const struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +                                  unsigned int fbit)
> +{
> +     /* Did you forget to fix assumptions on max features? */
> +     if (__builtin_constant_p(fbit))
> +             BUILD_BUG_ON(fbit >= 32);
> +     else
> +             BUG_ON(fbit >= 32);

Does this want to be a helper? Might be overkill, but I'm always wary
of changes that need to be applied manually in many different places :)

> +
> +     return test_bit(fbit, vdev->features);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __virtio_set_bit - helper to set feature bits. For use by transports.
> + * @vdev: the device
> + * @fbit: the feature bit
> + */
> +static inline void __virtio_set_bit(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +                                 unsigned int fbit)
> +{
> +     /* Did you forget to fix assumptions on max features? */
> +     if (__builtin_constant_p(fbit))
> +             BUILD_BUG_ON(fbit >= 32);
> +     else
> +             BUG_ON(fbit >= 32);
> +
> +     set_bit(fbit, vdev->features);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __virtio_clear_bit - helper to set feature bits. For use by transports.

s/set/clear/

> + * @vdev: the device
> + * @fbit: the feature bit
> + */
> +static inline void __virtio_clear_bit(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>                                     unsigned int fbit)
>  {
>       /* Did you forget to fix assumptions on max features? */
> @@ -90,10 +126,21 @@ static inline bool virtio_has_feature(const struct 
> virtio_device *vdev,
>       else
>               BUG_ON(fbit >= 32);
> 
> +     clear_bit(fbit, vdev->features);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * virtio_has_feature - helper to determine if this device has this feature.
> + * @vdev: the device
> + * @fbit: the feature bit
> + */
> +static inline bool virtio_has_feature(const struct virtio_device *vdev,
> +                                   unsigned int fbit)
> +{
>       if (fbit < VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START)
>               virtio_check_driver_offered_feature(vdev, fbit);
> 
> -     return test_bit(fbit, vdev->features);
> +     return __virtio_test_bit(vdev, fbit);
>  }
> 
>  static inline

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to