From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:01:27 +0100

The free_percpu() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
index 30790d7..4856232 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
@@ -592,11 +592,9 @@ fail_online:
 fail_l2:
        if (cpu_has_perfctr_nb)
                perf_pmu_unregister(&amd_nb_pmu);
-       if (amd_uncore_l2)
-               free_percpu(amd_uncore_l2);
+       free_percpu(amd_uncore_l2);
 fail_nb:
-       if (amd_uncore_nb)
-               free_percpu(amd_uncore_nb);
+       free_percpu(amd_uncore_nb);
 
 fail_nodev:
        return ret;
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to