(spotted while looking at a 'git bisect visualize' for something else) After this commit:
Author: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.willi...@intel.com> 2014-09-13 03:40:47
Committer: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> 2014-10-23 23:38:04
i40e: Add 10GBaseT support
Add driver support for 10GBaseT device.
we have the following chunk of code in i40e_ethtool.c:
case I40E_PHY_TYPE_10GBASE_SFPP_CU:
ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full;
break;
case I40E_PHY_TYPE_1000BASE_KX:
case I40E_PHY_TYPE_1000BASE_T:
ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full |
SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
ecmd->advertising = ADVERTISED_Autoneg |
ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full |
ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
ADVERTISED_100baseT_Full;
break;
case I40E_PHY_TYPE_100BASE_TX:
ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full |
SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
ecmd->advertising = ADVERTISED_Autoneg |
ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full |
ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
ADVERTISED_100baseT_Full;
break;
case I40E_PHY_TYPE_SGMII:
ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
I'm confused by the fact that 2 cases that by name are 100M and 1G parts
got bits saying that 10G is "supported" - was that intentional?
pgpGwDoSGBvRY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
