Hi Steven,

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014, Steven Walter wrote:
> The bluetooth spec states that automatically flushable packets may not
> be sent over a LE-U link.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Walter <stevenrwal...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> index 4af3821..7c4350f 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void l2cap_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 
> ident, u8 code, u16 len,
>       if (!skb)
>               return;
>  
> -     if (lmp_no_flush_capable(conn->hcon->hdev))
> +     if (lmp_no_flush_capable(conn->hcon->hdev) || conn->hcon->type == 
> LE_LINK)
>               flags = ACL_START_NO_FLUSH;
>       else
>               flags = ACL_START;
> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static bool __chan_is_moving(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
>  static void l2cap_do_send(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>       struct hci_conn *hcon = chan->conn->hcon;
> -     u16 flags;
> +     u16 flags = ACL_START;
>  
>       BT_DBG("chan %p, skb %p len %d priority %u", chan, skb, skb->len,
>              skb->priority);
> @@ -798,11 +798,13 @@ static void l2cap_do_send(struct l2cap_chan *chan, 
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>               return;
>       }
>  
> -     if (!test_bit(FLAG_FLUSHABLE, &chan->flags) &&
> -         lmp_no_flush_capable(hcon->hdev))
> +     if (hcon->type == LE_LINK) {
> +             /* LE-U does not support auto-flushing packets */
>               flags = ACL_START_NO_FLUSH;
> -     else
> -             flags = ACL_START;
> +     } else if (!test_bit(FLAG_FLUSHABLE, &chan->flags) &&
> +                 lmp_no_flush_capable(hcon->hdev)) {
> +             flags = ACL_START_NO_FLUSH;
> +     }

I think Marcel was after just providing a clarifying code comment in
both places - having two branches of an if-statement doing exactly the
same thing looks a bit weird to me. To make thins completely clear I'd
suggest adding a simple helper function that you can call from both
places to get the needed flags, something like the following:

static u16 get_acl_flags(struct hci_conn *hcon, struct l2cap_chan *chan)
{
        /* LE-U does not support auto-flushing packets */
        if (hcon->type == LE_LINK)
                return ACL_START_NO_FLUSH;

        /* If non-flushable packets are not supported don't request them */
        if (!lmp_no_flush_capable(hcon->hdev))
                 return ACL_START;

        /* If the chan has requested auto-flushing go with that */
        if (chan && test_bit(FLAG_FLUSHABLE, &chan->flags))
                return ACL_START;

        /* Otherwise go with a non-flushable packet */
        return ACL_START_NO_FLUSH;
}

This way we'd avoid complex if-statements and can clearly document each
condition independently.

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to