On 14 November 2014 08:06, Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Moves clock state to struct clk_core, but takes care to change as little API 
>> as
>> possible.
>>
>> struct clk_hw still has a pointer to a struct clk, which is the
>> implementation's per-user clk instance, for backwards compatibility.
>>
>> The struct clk that clk_get_parent() returns isn't owned by the caller, but 
>> by
>> the clock implementation, so the former shouldn't call clk_put() on it.
>>
>> Because some boards in mach-omap2 still register clocks statically, their 
>> clock
>> registration had to be updated to take into account that the clock 
>> information
>> is stored in struct clk_core now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>
>
> It would be good to have Russell at least ack the clkdev bits.
> There's still more work to do in the future here, but
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>

Thanks, Stephen.

Russell, do you think we could have your ack?

Regards,

Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to