On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:58:11AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:43:00AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > @@ -1837,6 +1839,9 @@ static void __split_huge_page_refcount(struct page
> > > *page,
> > > atomic_sub(tail_count, &page->_count);
> > > BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count) <= 0);
> > >
> > > + page->_mapcount = *compound_mapcount_ptr(page);
> >
> > Is atomic_set() necessary?
>
> Do you mean
> atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, atomic_read(compound_mapcount_ptr(page)));
> ?
>
> I don't see why we would need this. Simple assignment should work just
> fine. Or we have archs which will break?
Sorry, I was wrong, please ignore this comment.
> > > @@ -6632,10 +6637,12 @@ static void dump_page_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > > void dump_page_badflags(struct page *page, const char *reason,
> > > unsigned long badflags)
> > > {
> > > - printk(KERN_ALERT
> > > - "page:%p count:%d mapcount:%d mapping:%p index:%#lx\n",
> > > + pr_alert("page:%p count:%d mapcount:%d mapping:%p index:%#lx",
> > > page, atomic_read(&page->_count), page_mapcount(page),
> > > page->mapping, page->index);
> > > + if (PageCompound(page))
> >
> > > + printk(" compound_mapcount: %d", compound_mapcount(page));
> > > + printk("\n");
> >
> > These two printk() should be pr_alert(), too?
>
> No. It will split the line into several messages in dmesg.
This splitting is fine. I meant that these printk()s are for one series
of message, so setting the same log level looks reasonable to me.
> > > @@ -986,9 +986,30 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
> > > void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
> > > struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, int flags)
> > > {
> > > - int first = atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount);
> > > + bool compound = flags & RMAP_COMPOUND;
> > > + bool first;
> > > +
> > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(compound_head(page)), page);
> > > +
> > > + if (PageTransCompound(page)) {
> > > + struct page *head_page = compound_head(page);
> > > +
> > > + if (compound) {
> > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
> > > + first =
> > > atomic_inc_and_test(compound_mapcount_ptr(page));
> >
> > Is compound_mapcount_ptr() well-defined for tail pages?
>
> The page is head page, otherwise VM_BUG_ON on the line above would trigger.
Ah, OK.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
> > > @@ -1032,10 +1052,19 @@ void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
> > >
> > > VM_BUG_ON(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end);
> > > SetPageSwapBacked(page);
> > > - atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0); /* increment count (starts at -1) */
> > > if (compound) {
> > > + atomic_t *compound_mapcount;
> > > +
> > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
> > > + compound_mapcount = (atomic_t *)&page[1].mapping;
> >
> > You can use compound_mapcount_ptr() here.
>
> Right, thanks.
>
> --
> Kirill A. Shutemov
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
