find_new_reaper() does 2 completely different things. Not only it finds a reaper, it also updates pid_ns->child_reaper or kills the whole namespace if the caller is ->child_reaper.
Now that has_child_subreaper logic doesn't depend on child_reaper check we can move that pid_ns code into a separate helper. IMHO this makes the code more clean, and this allows the next changes. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> --- kernel/exit.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 266e4f4..00c6139 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -459,6 +459,34 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *tsk) clear_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE); } +static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father) + __releases(&tasklist_lock) + __acquires(&tasklist_lock) +{ + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(father); + struct task_struct *reaper = pid_ns->child_reaper; + + if (likely(reaper != father)) + return reaper; + + for_each_thread(father, reaper) { + if (reaper->flags & PF_EXITING) + continue; + pid_ns->child_reaper = reaper; + return reaper; + } + + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) { + panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n", + father->signal->group_exit_code ?: father->exit_code); + } + zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns); + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + + return father; +} + /* * When we die, we re-parent all our children, and try to: * 1. give them to another thread in our thread group, if such a member exists @@ -466,33 +494,17 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *tsk) * child_subreaper for its children (like a service manager) * 3. give it to the init process (PID 1) in our pid namespace */ -static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father) - __releases(&tasklist_lock) - __acquires(&tasklist_lock) +static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father, + struct task_struct *child_reaper) { - struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(father); struct task_struct *thread; for_each_thread(father, thread) { if (thread->flags & PF_EXITING) continue; - if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) - pid_ns->child_reaper = thread; return thread; } - if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) { - write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); - if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) { - panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n", - father->signal->group_exit_code ?: - father->exit_code); - } - - zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns); - write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); - } - if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) { struct task_struct *reaper; /* @@ -501,7 +513,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father) * namespace, this is safe because all its threads are dead. */ for (reaper = father; - !same_thread_group(reaper, pid_ns->child_reaper); + !same_thread_group(reaper, child_reaper); reaper = reaper->real_parent) { /* call_usermodehelper() descendants need this check */ if (reaper == &init_task) @@ -515,7 +527,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father) } } - return pid_ns->child_reaper; + return child_reaper; } /* @@ -552,7 +564,9 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct *father) exit_ptrace(father, &dead_children); /* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */ - reaper = find_new_reaper(father); + reaper = find_child_reaper(father); + + reaper = find_new_reaper(father, reaper); list_for_each_entry(p, &father->children, sibling) { for_each_thread(p, t) { t->real_parent = reaper; -- 1.5.5.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
