On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:44:11AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> 
> Move the cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip function.
> No change in behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/machine.c | 62 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index d97309c..dd8496a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -1384,11 +1384,35 @@ struct mem_info *sample__resolve_mem(struct 
> perf_sample *sample,
>  static int add_callchain_ip(struct thread *thread,
>                           struct symbol **parent,
>                           struct addr_location *root_al,
> -                         int cpumode,
> +                         u8 cpumode,

Andi's patch got in:
b3340a5 perf callchain: Support handling complete branch stacks as histograms

and it uses the cpumode check for -1, so it needs to stay int, otherwise
there's a compilation failure:

  CC       util/machine.o
util/machine.c: In function ‘add_callchain_ip’:
util/machine.c:1419:14: error: comparison is always false due to limited range 
of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (cpumode == -1)
              ^


jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to