On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:11:03 +0800
> index 539ca3c..9a69353
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
> int best_cpu = -1;
> const struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
>
> - if (later_mask && cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cp->free_cpus)) {
> + if (later_mask && cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus,
> + &p->cpus_allowed) && cpumask_and(later_mask,
> + later_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
I did a quick review of this patch, and it looks fine to me. But the
above looks ugly. Please change it to something more readable like:
if (later_mask &&
cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
Thanks,
-- Steve
> best_cpu = cpumask_any(later_mask);
> goto out;
> } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_maximum(cp), &p->cpus_allowed) &&
> @@ -186,6 +188,17 @@ out:
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
