On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 21:42:10 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> - seq_printf(m, "\n"); > + seq_puts(m, "\n"); > > @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static int probes_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > > for (i = 0; i < tk->tp.nr_args; i++) > seq_printf(m, " %s=%s", tk->tp.args[i].name, > tk->tp.args[i].comm); > - seq_printf(m, "\n"); > + seq_puts(m, "\n"); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > index 33ff6a2..184aec1 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int probes_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > for (i = 0; i < tu->tp.nr_args; i++) > seq_printf(m, " %s=%s", tu->tp.args[i].name, > tu->tp.args[i].comm); > > - seq_printf(m, "\n"); > + seq_puts(m, "\n"); These can actually be seq_putc(m, '\n'); I saw this because one of them conflicted with a change I already had. No need to resend, I'll just update them myself. Trivial enough. -- Steve > return 0; > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
