>>> On 12.11.14 at 21:36, <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >> >> Nothing crashes with the unwind information being wrong. It is >> solely you who was claiming (without proof) years ago that the >> unwinder repeatedly caused issues. > > Umm. We had oopses showing it. Several times.
And I know you've been saying so before. The only problem here is - these weren't sent my way for investigation, at least as far as I recall. >> Yes, we did find a bug or two over the years in it > > .. and you and Andi repeatedly refused to make the code more robust > when I asked. True, we considered _some_ of the requests you made wrong. > Which is why I don't work with Andi or you directly any more, People thinking differently than you in certain aspects shouldn't preclude working with them directly, should it? Yes, it's a project you started, but it has long become a community one, and as such excluding people just because they don't conform to every opinion of yours is, well, odd. > But this patch I NAK'ed because the code is not readable, and the > infrastructure is not bearable. > > Live with it. I got the message. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
