Now .suspend/resume_noirq() callbacks will not be called during
system wide suspend/resume for devices which belongs to some GPD.
It seems, that this change was accidently introduced by
commit d23b9b00cdde ("PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback
 routines (v2)").

This patch restores calling of .suspend/resume_noirq() callbacks
for devices from GPD during system wide suspend/resume.

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index fb83d4a..f8c70e6 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1014,6 +1014,7 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
 static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
+       int ret;
 
        dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -1021,8 +1022,14 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
        if (IS_ERR(genpd))
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       if (genpd->suspend_power_off
-           || (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev)))
+       if (genpd->suspend_power_off)
+               return 0;
+
+       ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
                return 0;
 
        genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
@@ -1065,8 +1072,9 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
         */
        pm_genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
        genpd->suspended_count--;
+       genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
 
-       return genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
+       return pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to