On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:02 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:02:49AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > > > mips has additional sync. > > > > > > But atomic_dec + 2 barries is going to do the sync as well, no? > > > > On UP do not. > > Shouldn't we should be fixing the MIPS implementation of > atomic_sub_return to not do the sync on UP then?
Unfortunately not, that sync is required exactly for return value store.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
