Hi,

pushed this patch too, with amendments.

On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 13:50 -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> @@ -279,6 +283,7 @@ static int ubifs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
> *dentry, umode_t mode,
>       err = ubifs_jnl_update(c, dir, &dentry->d_name, inode, 0, 0);
>       if (err)
>               goto out_cancel;
> +
>       mutex_unlock(&dir_ui->ui_mutex);

Removed this junk newline change here and in other similar places.
> +size_t ubifs_security_listxattr(struct dentry *d, char *list, size_t 
> list_size,
> +                             const char *name, size_t name_len, int flags)

Made this to be static, renamed to 'security_listxattr()'.

> +int ubifs_security_getxattr(struct dentry *d, const char *name,
> +                         void *buffer, size_t size, int flags)

Similar: rename + static.

> +int ubifs_security_setxattr(struct dentry *d, const char *name,
> +                         const void *value, size_t size,
> +                         int flags, int handler_flags)
Similar: rename + static.

> +struct xattr_handler ubifs_xattr_security_handler = {

Renamed, made static and const too.

> +static int ubifs_initxattrs(struct inode *inode,
> +                         const struct xattr *xattr_array, void *fs_info)

Renamed to just init_xattrs(), for the consistency reasons, the ones I
explained in the review to the patch 2/4.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to