On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:31:40PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > Actually, yeah, that does look like it'd work. Are you OK with me adding > an enum to the cqm_rmid_entry? You had concerns in the past about > growing the size of the struct.
That was because I was thinking you did nr_rmid*sizeof(cqm_rmid_entry) allocation, shortly thereafter I noticed you did a pointer alloc and then allocated each individual entry. Also, that enum can fit the hole you made there I think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/