On 11/10/2014 4:17 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:06:00PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
+ MCESEV(
+ DEFERRED, "Deferred error",
+ NOSER,
MASK(MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON, MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED)
),
We don't need to have MCI_STATUS_POISON in the MASK() here as a deferred
error is indicated by a {UC=0, Deferred = 1}
(Older docs might be unclear on that..)
Well, I think that's ok because the MASK() macro actually makes the
check do:
look at bits MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON and of
them three MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED has to be the only one set.
And that makes sense - we want deferred errors where we didn't attempt
to consume poisoned data (which is signalled by MCI_STATUS_POISON)....
Yeah, makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrish...@amd.com>
Thanks,
-Aravind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
