On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:11:29 +0300 Евгений Поляков <z...@ioremap.net> wrote:
> Hi > > 08.11.2014, 02:33, "NeilBrown" <ne...@suse.de>: > > 1/ change request_module call to zero-pad single digit > > family numbers. This appears to be the intention of > > the code, but not what it actually does. > > > > This means that the alias created for W1_FAMILY_SMEM_01 > > might actually be useful. > > > > 2/ Define a family name for the BQ27000 battery charge monitor. > > Unfortunately this is the same number as W1_FAMILY_SMEM_01 > > so if both a compiled on a system, one module might need to > > be blacklisted. > > > > 3/ Add a MODULE_ALIAS for the bq27000. > > > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de> > > Looks good to me. > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <z...@ioremap.net> > > Which tree should this patch use to get into the kernel? MAINTAINERS lists you as the maintainer, so I though you would know. When is doubt: send to akpm .. or gregkh. It looks like greg has more Signed-off-by's in drivers/w1 than akpm, so I'll add your acked-by and send to him. Thanks, NeilBrown
pgpgxxaBkrPpD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
