Not that I'm actually involved any more, but I'd endorse the user_regset approach and not the new request. On many (most?) machines, it's already part of the main integer regset (orig_rax et al) and adding another mechanism is redundant. Using user_regset also means there won't be a word of hidden state that is not visible in core dumps. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request AKASHI Takahiro
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL re... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCAL... Will Deacon
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SY... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SE... Russell King - ARM Linux
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add gener... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add g... Will Deacon
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: a... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: a... Kees Cook
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: a... Roland McGrath
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SE... Will Deacon
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add gener... AKASHI Takahiro
- Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL re... Oleg Nesterov