2.6.12-rc2, with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG. The in_atomic() macro thinks that preempt_disable() indicates an atomic region so calls to __might_sleep() result in a stack trace. preempt_count() returns 1, no soft or hard irqs are running and no spinlocks are held. It looks like there is no way to distinguish between the use of preempt_disable() in the lock functions (atomic) and preempt_disable() outside the lock functions (do nothing that might migrate me).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
